How to Curmudgeon

A number of people have asked me “How, exactly, do you become a curmudgeon?”  Actually, no one asked me that but I’m sure a few have thought about it and a few more have even hinted at it.  I’m here to set the record straight.

A curmudgeon is defined as a crusty, ill-tempered old man.  While generally male, a curmudgeon graces both sexes (think Alice Roosevelt Longworth, Dorothy Parker and Paula Poundstone).  I am one and, with counseling, you can be one too.  (If not, then you’ll just need counseling.)

What, you may ask, is the value of being a curmudgeon?

  1.  You never have to smile in public;
  2. No one will expect you to smile in public;
  3. You can redefine “pursuit of happiness;”
  4. You expect nothing and are never disappointed.

So how, exactly do you become a curmudgeon?  While there is no set formula, there are clues.

For example, did you look like this a child?

grumpy_child2

Do you look like this as an adult?

grumpy_man2

When a clerk in a store or a greeter at a convention says to you “Have a nice day,” how do you respond?

  1. “Why, thank you very much.”
  2. “You’re so welcome and I hope you have one, too.”
  3. “I’m sorry, I have other plans.”

When an important looking person approaches you and says “Do you know who I am?” you respond by saying:

  1. “I am so sorry that I did not recognize you.”
  2. “Excuse my ignorance.”
  3. “You don’t know who you are?  Have you lost your memory?”

You regard children and small animals as:

  1. A sign of God’s love;
  2. Precious items to be protected and cherished;
  3. Unnecessary.

Which activity should be added as an Olympic sport?

  1. Skateboarding;
  2. Golf;
  3. Poisoning pigeons.

What do you do if you pee when you jump up and down?

  1. Resolve to exercise harder and ignore the issue;
  2. Go immediately to the doctor to find the source of the problem;
  3. Stop jumping up and down.

What slogan would you choose to put on a tee shirt?

  1. Enjoy life;
  2. I ♥ my dog;
  3. member National Sarcasm Society; like we need your help.

If you look like the people in the pictures and answered every question with “C,” then you may be on the road to being a curmudgeon.  If not, then you may be on the yellow brick road.

Oh, and have a nice day!  As you already know, I have other plans.

34 Comments

Filed under Curmudgeonry

The Sound of One Hand Clapping

First of all, I have NO IDEA why I chose the title I did for this post.  It just seemed appropriate even though this post is about hearing (or, more precisely, what I heard) but it would not make sense to title it “the sound of one ear clapping” or “the sound of one ear hearing” since one ear can hear.

I had returned to my boyhood home to visit my parents.  My mother and I sat in my old bedroom which she had converted into a small den.  It was spring in the Northeast but still quite cool so the windows were all closed.  As we sat and talked, I could discern a muffled noise coming from outside.  Listening closely, I could distinguish two separate voices – one a lower gruff voice, like a pirate captain barking orders to his crew and the second a higher shrill voice, not unlike a screeching night heron.  I don’t know that these are really the most descriptive terms for these voices.  Other descriptors are a fog-horn that smoked two packs of cigarettes a day and fingernails scraped across a chalkboard.   I only know that one voice was lower and male, the other was higher and female and both were harsh and unpleasant.

The_sound1

After a while listening to the voices, my mother and I looked at each other and I said “I think I recognize those voices.  That’s Uncle Fred and Aunt Ethyl.”  [Not their real names, of course.]  My uncle and aunt were having a knock-down, lights-out screaming argument.  There was nothing particularly astonishing about this since arguments between them were commonplace.  My uncle drank heavily, my aunt was shrewish and they made no bones about what each thought of the other.  I will soften this description by pointing out that I recall no physical exchange between them despite the vehemence of the arguments.  The arguments were commonplace and not astonishing to any of us in the immediate family.

What was astonishing was that my aunt and uncle were having this argument in their house – which was two blocks away.  Moreover, they were having the argument inside their house which was two blocks away with all the windows closed!  If I, today, had living witnesses, I would submit this incident to The Guinness Book of World Records as the loudest argument ever held between two people without artificial amplification.

My uncle’s heavy drinking and my aunt’s shrewish disposition and irritation with my uncle continued unabated for a number of years until my uncle’s death, which occurred early on Christmas morning.  To this day, I carry a crystal clear memory of both incidents and it may account for the reason that I have never, since that day, even thought of having a screaming argument with anyone.

After all, how could I compete?

22 Comments

Filed under Uncurmudgeonized

Writing the Next Great American Novel

Happy writers are all alike.  Every unhappy writer is unhappy is his own way.1

paraphrased from Anna Karenina

Writing_novel

Actually, that’s not true.  Unhappy writers are all alike as well.  Like me, they stare at a blank page and wait for inspiration.  I decided the other day that writing the next great American novel can’t be THAT hard.  What do these guys do but find a plot, put a bunch of words together and, Voilà!, in roles the reviews and the acclaim, not to mention the road tour, the book signings, the money and of course the novel-loving groupies.

On Monday morning, having decided to write the next great American novel, I wake up, eat breakfast, prepare for a great start and now stare and stare and expect that somewhere on the blank page is that magical smudge that will grow and grow and turn into page after page of magnificent verse.

1 pm:     I found the smudge on the page but it refuses to grow.  It’s probably shy or a slow grower or a late bloomer.  It just needs a little time.

3 pm:     No change.  I think that I will retrieve the mail and get a snack.

5 pm:     Still no change.  Man, that smudge is not cooperating one bit.  I think that my sock drawer needs rearranging.

7 pm:     You guessed it.  A glass or two of wine while I’m waiting would be helpful.

9 pm:     This smudge is starting to irritate me.  I need another glass of wine.

11 pm:  C’mon smudge!  I’m not looking for the next War and Peace, just your basic inspiring novel.  Time to break out another bottle of wine.

1 am:     Wass th’ matta, smudgy?  Gimme break.  I jus’ wan’ ta zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. . .

Okay, so maybe the next great American novel was biting off more than I could chew.  How about the next great American screenplay?  After all, how hard can THAT be?  You slap together a background to set the tone, assemble a few notable characters, give them some dialogue and Voilà!, your off to the producer and then opening night and the road tour, the signings, the money  and of course, the screenwriter-loving  groupies.

On Tuesday morning, I wake up (slowly), take an aspirin, eat breakfast and prepare myself for the next great American screenplay.  Now let me see, a choice backdrop.  Of course, a castle in Victorian England, where all great screenplays begin.  A few choice characters – Heathcliffe and Violet.  I’m rolling now.  Add the dialogue and I’m there.  I knew it was easy.

1 pm:  A scene in a Victorian castle drawing-room.  Violet enters the room where she finds Heathcliffe busily at work at his writing desk.

Heathcliffe:  “Damn, these accursed bills!”

Violet:  “Why, Heathcliffe, whatever is the matter?”

Heathcliffe:  “Can’t you see that I am busy, Violet?”

Violet:  ”O, Heathcliffe, why do always act so severe with me?”

[Aside to myself.  Does anybody talk like this nowadays?  Did anybody talk like this in Victorian England?  I need to rethink this.]

3 pm:   Revised Heathcliffe, Violet dialogue.  Yech, this revised dialogue stinks.  Maybe a walk around the block would help.

5 pm:  Newly revised dialogue.  No, this isn’t it.  Underwear drawer needs rearranging.

7 pm:  New, newly revised dialogue.  No better than before.  Relax and have a drink of wine.

9 pm:  Still no improvement.  I need another glass of wine.

11 pm:  I should be done with Act 1 by now.  Damn, where’s that wine bottle?

3 am:  Sla, bluk …? Huh? Where am I?

Alright, so maybe screenplays are just as hard as novels.  Perhaps I should ratchet back a notch before attacking novels and screenplays.  Hmm…  I know, the next great American cartoon.  How hard can THAT be?

1 pm:

Writing_cartoon1

  3 pm:

Writing_cartoon1

5 pm:

Writing_cartoon1

15 Comments

Filed under Rants about Writing

Dr. Language Guy Confesses

Dr LG Confesses

——————————————————————–

Penitent Dr. LG:  Forgive me Father for I have sinned.

Reproachful Priest:  How long has it been since your last confession?

——————————————————————–

Penitent Dr. LG:  Uh… well… it’s been a while.

Reproachful Priest:  That is okay, my son.  Tell me of your sins.

——————————————————————

Penitent Dr. LG:

Oh Father my sins are many.  I have tried to serve as a language maven but I have given misguided directions to my followers.  I have instructed them in better writing and diction but I have fallen victim to doubts and uncertainty.  I am beckoned by the siren calls of language change against which I have asked them to resist.  Not only that, these ideas seem to me quite normal and ones that should be incorporated into modern writing in place of their more stylistic but perhaps dated earlier forms.

Reproachful Priest:  ?

——————————————————————

Penitent Dr. LG:  Let me give you some examples of my transgressions.  I speak of the Oxford comma, the placement of quotation marks inside punctuation marks, and the split infinitive.

Reproachful Priest:  ??

——————————————————————

Penitent Dr. LG:

I’ll start with the Oxford comma.  As you may know, the Oxford comma (also called the Harvard comma or serial comma) is a comma placed immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and, or, or nor) in a series of three or more terms.  For example, we may punctuate three items as “A, B, and C” (with the serial comma) or “A, B and C” (without the serial comma).  Long have I railed against the use of the serial comma as unnecessary.  While the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it, many other style guides like The Chicago Manual of Style, Strunk and White’s Elements of Style, and the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual advocate its use.  How can I disagree with such an auspicious group?1

1 portions excerpted from Wikipedia

Then there is the placement of punctuation marks outside of quotation marks.  I have been told that “periods and commas always go inside quotation marks, even inside single quotes.”  Yet, fewer and fewer writers do this and I have a hard time explaining why they should.  Isn’t it easier to let the quotation marks set off the quoted or emphasized phrase and then end with the terminating punctuation mark?  Oh I fear these voices.

These same voices tell me that it matters not that I split my infinitives!  Is it any improvement or difference, they say, “to go boldy” than “to boldy go” where no writer has gone before?  The evil voices are winning, Father, they are winning.

Oh and I don’t even want to tell you how I refuse to give up the long-established habit of placing two spaces instead of one between sentences.  I know it’s wasteful of space but I cannot help but believe it gives better readability and I’m here to confess these and many other sins too numerous to mention.

Reproachful Priest:  [After a long pause]  I believe that you are at the wrong confessional, my son.

——————————————————————

Penitent Dr. LG:  Well, did I confess to you about how I once thought that Steven Seagal was a good actor?

Reproachful Priest:  I’m listening…

24 Comments

Filed under Rants about Writing

Change my Gravatar, Please!

When I started my blog, I chose a gravatar to represent an old, grouchy curmudgeon.   Statler the Muppet seemed a good choice.  Now I wonder if my image as a Curmudgeon-at-Large needs an update.  But what should I choose?

Here are some possibilities concocted after a late night of heavy medication:

In order, they are:

Chad the Chippendale?, William Powell,
Caligula, Walter Brennan,
Fulgencio Batista, High School nerd,
William Henry Harrison, Tiny Tim,
Vlad the Impaler, Vlad the Impaler?! (Honest, this image came up when Googling Vlad the Impaler),
Jude81 (justmakingconvo’s boyfriend), Jude the Obscure,
BK Bacchus, Gangster Bacchus,
Grade B movie warrior (from veggie macabre), Gomer Pyle

What do you think?  I am open to suggestions.

In the meantime, I’ll stick with Statler   …or me with a paper bag over my head.

44 Comments

Filed under Curmudgeonry